善良的男人

How UK Bill Shields Mainstream Media & Axes Russian News Under Guise of Press Freedom_我的网站

白莲花

A | "Social media is now the main source of information about the world for 16-24-year-olds, and for all ethnic minorities in the UK," explained Ellis Cashmore, honorary professor of sociology at Aston University in the UK.,"Yet platform moderators have practically unrestricted power to edit, and, if they wish, remove content. This is an unheard-of censorial power. I can't think that, in history, proprietors have ever had such colossal power to control the flow and content of information, not just to one population, but to the world.",The Online Safety Bill was first introduced in the British Parliament in March 2022 with the aim of holding social media platforms, search engines and various websites to account for hosting illegal activities or spreading harmful content.,The newly introduced amendment is "designed to guard against the arbitrary removal of articles from journalists at recognized news outlets when shared on social media platforms," according to the UK government's website. The authors of the amendment draw attention to the fact that half of British adults use social media for news, with Facebook*, Twitter and Instagram* being the most popular platforms. When it comes to 16-24 year-olds, the internet is the most-used platform.,Once the bill comes into force, social media giants would be required "to ensure recognized news publishers’ articles remain viewable and accessible on their sites even if they are under review by moderators.",Facebook Doesn't Know What Happens to Users' Data, How It Spreads as Regulators Tighten Their Grip27 April, 19:01 GMT,The introduction of the new amendment can be explained by the fact that the tech giants have proved themselves impossible to control, the professor explained.,"Tech companies operate in a relatively unrestricted way and governments around the world usually rely on the companies' goodwill," he said.,Still, the new amendment is focused on so-called "category one companies", which include "the largest and most popular social media platforms", and is not designed to shield alternative media sources.,The bill's selective approach has been manifested by its earlier amendment obligating social media platforms "to proactively look for and remove disinformation from foreign state actors which harm the UK." It specifically singles out Russian news, with an obvious reference to Sputnik News and RT - both previously banned by the EU and social media giants after the beginning of the Russian special operation to de-militarize and de-Nazify Ukraine.,"Freedom of speech and expression are highly valued principles in western Europe and North America," says Cashmore. "But it is interesting that, after the beginning of the conflict in Ukraine, there were no protests at the decisions of western governments to prohibit broadcasts and news supplies from RT, Sputnik and maybe a few less important news outlets.",EU Bans Work of Sputnik News Sites, Broadcasting of RT TV Channel in the Community From 2 March2 March, 11:53 GMT,The professor notes that wiping Russian news from the media sphere is senseless given that many westerners are interested in learning Russian perspectives. "This does not mean they would be persuaded or even influenced, but they feel entitled to make up their own minds independently. They have been denied that facility," Cashmore stressed.,"Since February, Russia, its people and its values have been condemned, denounced and stigmatized," said the professor. "Vladimir Putin has been personally vilified. It is difficult to see this ending, at least not for 30 years. Russia has been excluded from many world affairs and many believe Russia and the other BRICS countries may coalesce into an international configuration to rival NATO. This would become a new world order.",Meanwhile, the bill's amendments have raised concerns among British campaigners who are warning the government that in its current form the proposed internet safety laws are “on the verge of being unworkable," according to The Independent.,In particular, campaigners have advocated for a number of measures to strengthen freedom of expression and rights safeguards to better protect people from marginalized backgrounds and expand transparency requirements on firms to boost access to data for researchers and academics.,*Facebook and Instagram are banned in Russia over extremist activities.。新加坡元近日升至近十年来的最高水平，反映了市场对新加坡货币政策的信心。随着全球经济的不确定性增加，新元的强势表现引发了广泛关注。1. 新元强势：市场对新加坡货币政策有信心8月23日，新加坡元兑美元汇率触及十年高位，显示出市场对新加坡金融管理局强硬货币政策的信任。2024年，新元上涨约1.5%，成为亚洲表现第二好的货币，紧随马来西亚林吉特之后。新加坡金融管理局通过升值新元来抑制通胀的措施，进一步增强了新元的吸引力。尽管全球经济充满不确定性，新加坡政府将2024年的增长预测上调至2%至3%之间，表明经济扩张将继续支撑新元的升值趋势。这一升值趋势表明，新元在全球经济动荡中的避险地位不断提升。然而，市场对未来的走势依然持谨慎态度，尤其是在美联储的政策影响下。

B | 来源：Google财经2. 美联储政策对新元的潜在影响8月23日，美联储主席鲍威尔在杰克逊霍尔的讲话几乎确认了美国将在9月降息。

C | 这一消息导致美元走弱，促使新元进一步升值。

D | 然而，新元兑美元的进一步上涨空间可能有限，因其已经接近新加坡金融管理局政策区间的强势一侧。

E | 华侨银行外汇策略师黄先生指出，尽管市场有信心抛售美元，但新元的涨幅可能落后于其他货币。

F | 新加坡金融管理局更关注新元的名义有效汇率，这意味着新元的上涨可能在政策区间内受到限制。未来几个月，新元的表现将受到美联储政策的进一步影响。降息预期的加强可能继续推动新元升值，但市场也需警惕潜在的波动性。来源：bankofsingapore3. 展望未来：新元升值的可持续性尽管新元近期表现强劲，但其未来升值的可持续性仍然存在不确定性。新加坡政府上调的经济增长预测为新元提供了支撑，但外部需求的波动仍可能影响新元的长期走势。新加坡金融管理局可能会采取措施，防止新元升值过快，以确保经济稳定。此外，全球市场的不确定性以及美联储政策的变化也可能对新元造成影响。市场参与者应密切关注新加坡金融管理局的政策动向，以及全球经济环境的变化。这将是决定新元未来走势的关键因素。来源：straitstimes新加坡元近期的强势表现反映了市场对新加坡货币政策的信心。然而，未来的升值空间可能受到限制，特别是在美联储政策变化的背景下。投资者需谨慎应对市场波动，并关注新加坡金融管理局的政策指引。